Fire Nuggets Current Issue®

August-September  2006


Ventilation Principles, Part III

By John Mittendorf

Backdraft

Backdraft: The introduction of oxygen to a confined area that is pressurized with heated-flammable gases, that are deficient in oxygen, that results in an explosive force of significant intensity.

Unlike flashover (see below), potential backdraft conditions can generally be identified by several key warning signs. However, before considering the identification and method of minimizing or eliminating a backdraft, let's review some basic theory to understand the why of a backdraft.

If a free-burning fire is transferred to a confined building and allowed to burn, the fire initially has the proper ratio of fuel, heat, and oxygen, which is about 21 per cent in air. This is referred to as the first phase of a fire. As this process continues, an interesting chain of events is initiated. As the quantity of hot gases and smoke in the room increases, the available oxygen necessary for combustion is reduced. As the oxygen content is reduced below 21 per cent, the burning rate will decrease and the production of smoke, heat, and fire gases will increase. The increased smoke and heat will fill the interior of the room and try to exhaust through any available openings. Additionally, the oxygen content will be reduced to about 17 per cent, levels of carbon monoxide and other products of combustion will increase, and temperatures may exceed 1,300-degrees F. This is referred to as the second phase of a fire.

At this point however, another condition is rapidly becoming significant. As the fire continues to burn, the ratio of heat, fuel, and oxygen has become unbalanced, with levels of oxygen approaching 13-15 per cent, which is not adequate to support a free burning fire. When the percentage of oxygen reaches 13-15 per cent, the fire will smolder due to insufficient oxygen and is referred to as the third phase of a fire.

Simultaneously, with the fire smoldering and the subsequent reduction of oxygen in the room, the fire gases and products of smoke have been heated and have also expanded. In fact, the volumetric expansion of gases and products of smoke can increase up to a factor of three, creating a significant pressure inside the structure. This internal pressure will force smoke from all cracks or other available openings. At this stage, the room is pressurized, flammable carbon monoxide is abundant, temperatures are high, and oxygen levels are low. Obviously, we have a prime opportunity for a backdraft if oxygen is suddenly introduced through an open door or window.

Now that we have reviewed the why of a backdraft, consider the following trademarks of a potential backdraft:

  • Fires that are restricted or confined by a structure.

  • Smoke issuing under pressure from any available opening.

  • Smoke can periodically change direction and be drawn back into the structure, sometimes with a noticeable draft and/or whistling sound.

  • Doors and windows may be hot to the touch. Additionally, windows may appear dark. That darkness is heavy concentrations of thick smoke behind the glass.

  • Heavy, dark smoke. Additionally, the smoke may appear to be turbulent and boiling due to the fact that it has been under pressure, is escaping, and is expanding as it escapes.

Once a potential backdraft has been identified, how can it be minimized or eliminated? The hazard of a backdraft can be eliminated by vertical ventilation over the involved area. This will reduce the internal temperatures and exhaust smoke and fire gases from the uppermost portion of a contaminated area to the exterior of a structure. The vertically exhausting superheated smoke and fire gases will not allow the introduction of a fresh supply of oxygen to the oxygen deprived fire. Conversely, if horizontal ventilation is utilized, fresh oxygen can be introduced to the oxygen deprived fire. Although the preceding question and answer are simple, practical fireground application may prove difficult due to limited experience, training, and the fact that suppression personnel can be very competitive. Some attack personnel find it difficult to stand at the doorway of an involved structure with a loaded hose line and wait for additional personnel to create an appropriate ventilation opening. However, to reduce or eliminate the chance of an apparent backdraft, a coordinated operation must be initiated between suppression personnel with hose lines, and ventilation personnel ventilating above a fire. If ventilation above a fire precedes entry into the structure, heat, smoke and fire gases will be reduced and so will the potential for a backdraft. The success of this operation is dependent on the following factors:

  • Recognition of a potential backdraft.

  • Communication between ground and ventilation personnel.

  • Timing between ground and ventilation personnel that results in ventilation preceding entry into a structure.

Flashover

Flashover: "The sudden ignition of exposed combustible surfaces and/or combustible gases in an involved area that results in a sudden and intense rise in temperature."

Although the definitions of flashover and backdraft (see above) may initially appear similar, flashover is substantially different from a backdraft due to the omission of the following three subtle principles:

  • Sudden introduction of oxygen (to an oxygen-deficient atmosphere).

  • Confined space or area.

  • Pressurized, heated flammable gases.

As a fire burns in a building, the heat and products of combustion rise to the highest available point then begin to bank down. As this process continues, another chain of events is simultaneously taking place. As heat and other products of combustion collect at the highest possible point, their temperature will increase. This rising temperature will also increase the temperature of adjacent materials which assists heated gases and products of combustion in radiating additional heat to exposed combustible materials. If this process continues, a flashover can occur with sudden rapidity when combustible fire gases, smoke, and/or contents within the fire area reach their ignition temperature. Currently, there are two viewpoints on the cause of a flashover. One viewpoint states that as the contents within a room are heated to their ignition temperature from radiated heat, a flashover of these combustible materials will occur when their ignition temperature is reached. The other viewpoint states that combustible smoke and fire gases will initially flashover when their ignition temperature is reached, and can then cause exposed contents to also suddenly flashover as their ignition temperature is abruptly elevated to their ignition temperature. Although both of these viewpoints have merit, current video tapes of tests and actual fires indicate that a flashover normally begins with the sudden ignition of combustible smoke and fire gases which then can result in the exposed contents also flashing over. This process is dependent on the following factors:

  • Size and duration of the fire.

  • Size of the fire area.

  • Adequate supply of oxygen.

  • Combustible contents (types and degree of flammability) within the room, (i.e., paneling, curtains, furniture, etc.).

  • Confined area. A confined building will greatly enhance the flashover process, whereas an area that has some type of ventilation (natural or mechanical) will reduce the buildup of heat, radiation and chance of flashover.

Consider a typical scenario: 

  • Fire in an enclosed room.

  • An open door (natural ventilation).

  • Two attack personnel have entered the room with an attack line.

This fire is responsible for heat, gases and products of combustion rising to the highest point, then banking down as illustrated. As the fire continues to burn, heat and smoke will also continue to bank down. The density of the smoke will increase as temperatures in the upper portion of the room and radiated heat continue to rise. Up until this point, the attack personnel have been able to stand erect as they approach the fire. This is due to moderate temperatures, their safety equipment, and natural ventilation from the open door. However, if the fire continues to burn, the attack personnel may encounter three distinct temperature zones as follows:

  • Extreme heat due to rising heat from the fire and radiated heat.

  • High heat from heated gases within the room and radiated heat.

  • Moderate heat from heated gases within the room and radiated heat.

At this point, let's assume that the smoke and fire gases at the upper portion of the room have reached their ignition temperature and flash over, creating a sudden and intense rise in temperature and a loss of visibility within the entire room due to increased smoke and heat levels. Tests have shown that this type of flashover can result in the following conditions:

  • Immediate drop in the oxygen level from 21-percent to four-percent.

  • Immediate increase in the carbon monoxide level from low levels to 40,000 parts-per-million (levels in the range of 4,000 parts-per-million can be fatal).

  • Immediate increase in the temperature level to over 1,000 degrees at the five-foot level and over l,800-degrees at the ceiling level (eight-foot room).

Obviously, these conditions are immediately untenable for suppression personnel and may result in injury or death. Consider the following conditions present in this scenario:

  • The fire had significant oxygen for combustion.

  • The fire received some ventilation through the open door.

  • The heated flammable gases and smoke were not pressurized due to ventilation through the open door.

These three principles are confronted on a daily basis but may not be recognized as a potential hazard. Most fireground personnel are familiar with the term backdraft, yet may not consider or recognize the possibility of flashover. Consider the conditions that may indicate a potential flashover:

  • A free-burning fire within a building that is resulting in a buildup or accumulation of heat and smoke within the building.

  • Smoke that is increasing in heat and density and may or may not be banking down.

  • Suppression personnel being forced to stay low due to increased heat.

Following are several additional considerations:

  • Be familiar and aware of potential flashover conditions. A flashover can be potentially more dangerous than a backdraft due to subtle warning signs.

  • Take precautions when entering a structure with a fire that is exhibiting smoke and heat (and possibly flame) above personnel. Remember that it is possible for these conditions to exist even when personnel enter a structure that offers good visibility and low heat conditions.

  • Be constantly aware of the environment and changing conditions. Safety equipment utilized today is superior to the safety equipment of several years ago and is constantly being improved. This has resulted, and will continue to result, in reduced firefighter injuries and improved fire suppression operations. It has also enabled suppression personnel to easily enter and advance into an involved structure with minimal discomfort. Remember that safety equipment is not to be used as an aggressive firefighting tool.

  • Similar to backdraft conditions, recognition of a potential flashover and resultant communications between ground and ventilation personnel is mandatory. Additional importance should be placed on ventilation operations that are capable of reducing accumulated heat, smoke, and fire gases, and reducing the potential for a flashover. Remember, flashover is a common problem in 2006, backdraft is not!

It is imperative that personnel engaged in suppression operations be aware of, and constantly monitor their fireground environment as follows:

  • When entering a structure, make a mental note of conditions. This gives personnel a baseline to evaluate an environment that will be degrading or improving as they advance into the structure.

  • Is there smoke with no heat, or smoke and heat? An absence of heat would indicate a reduced chance of a problem (food on the stove, etc), while smoke with heat increases the chances for a problem (structure fire, etc).

  • Is there acceptable visibility? Acceptable visibility is defined as "being capable of exiting the structure in an acceptable period of time". If personnel are going to push the envelope at an incident, at the minimum, be able to exit the structure in a timely manner.

  • Are conditions improving or not improving? If conditions are not improving, this is an indicator there is a lack of effective fire suppression and/or ventilation operations, and personnel should begin to evaluate their length of commitment.


Chief Mittendorf is the author of Truck Company Operations and Facing the Promotional Interview. To purchase, return to the main page and scroll down to Fire Engineering Books.


© Copyright Firenuggets.com 2006 • Click here for Terms and Conditions of Use

Home<•••SIGN OUT

RETURN TO CURRENT ISSUE INDEX