
 |
March-April
2008 |
 |
| |
|
The
Finer Points of Exposure Protection
By
Michael West
Many
classes on strategy and tactics use the acronym RECEO to describe the
order of importance of tactical factors. According to RECEO,
after we have handled the rescue efforts then we move on to exposure
control. While the concept is straight forward and common sense,
sometimes incident commanders may miss the finer points of exposure
protection. Here are a few points that should be considered when faced
with a rapidly expanding incident that threatens to burn down more
than one building.
-
Recognize
the impact of building construction and design in the spread of
fire. Space plays an important role in exposure issues but
so too does the construction of the building. Note the locations
and numbers of openings such as windows. The more openings, the
easier it is for fire to spread from one structure to the
next. The material a building is made of can also play an
important role. Buildings of masonry construction along side of
one another can allow fire to spread, but not nearly as rapidly as
wood framed buildings or worse yet, buildings with asphalt siding
(Photo 1).
 |
| Photo 1 –
The asphalt siding, narrow space, and multiple windows of
the fire building and exposure make this a difficult
situation. Add the fact that the fire building appears
to be vacant and the chance of rapid fire spread to the
exposure is compounded. Photo courtesy of Damian
Emerick, NFD |
-
Examine
the potential for the fire building to collapse into the exposure
and plan accordingly. If you are operating in the defensive mode
in the fire building it is important to take a careful look at the
possibility of collapse. If it does collapse toward the
exposure, is there a chance of collapsing the exposure or trapping
members working in the exposure (Photo 2)?
 |
|
Photo 2
– The four-story tenement has been written off. With its
distance and construction type, collapse is a possibility
and a careful risk/benefit analysis should take place
regarding operations in the “D” exposure. Photo courtesy
of Chief Kevin Keddy, APFD
|
-
What
hidden hazards may be present in the building that can cause a
violent change in the fire condition or cause an explosion or
catastrophic collapse? In older jurisdictions, multiple layers and
levels of ceilings can cause large voids for fire to build up in.
The possibility of a backdraft, once the ceiling layers collapse
can cause a collapse of the fire building that may lead to
extension or endanger firefighters working in or on the
exposure. Consider the presence of HAZMAT, flammable gasses,
or pressurized vessels that may also let go violently and cause a
similar issue. Call for the local gas company to send a
representative to assure that the natural gas lines into the
buildings has been secured (Photo 3).
|

|
| Photo 3 —
This recent fire in an attached row of mercantile occupancies
injured several firefighters when an explosion occurred late in
the incident. The preplanning of your district may give you
clues about the hidden dangers inherent in construction or
occupancy. Preplan the location of utility shut-offs to assure
they can be cut during an incident. Photo courtesy of Tom
Aurnhammer, www.buffaloheadfire.com |
-
After
considering #2 and #3, place lines inside the exposure(s) as
needed. Because you are defensive on the fire building does not
always dictate being defensive on the exposure. It’s
important to look at each building on the fireground both as a set
and as individual structures. Whenever possible, exposure
protection should include lines and personnel on the inside of the
exposure, checking for extension and taking steps to limit the
chance of extension before it happens. When working in the
exposure, take down combustible coverings at the windows and
attempt to leave windows intact to reduce fire spread. Close them
if they happen to be open. Place lines that have enough
length to cover all of the exposed floors and if that’s not
possible, place multiple lines as needed (Photo 4).
|

|
| Photo 4 –
This rapidly extending fire in a building under construction
will challenge the first arriving units. The placement of master
streams on the fire building and exposures, the use of handlines
inside of the exposures, and the effective use of tower ladders
is mandated. Photo courtesy of Eric Hurst, www.firstinphotography.com |
-
Back
on the outside, place large lines on the exposed exterior surfaces
and take care to keep exposure windows intact. Recognize the
limitations of ground based lines and master streams. Beyond the
3rd floor or so, their ability to penetrate into the fire building
is greatly reduced. The use of tower ladders is very effective on
covering exposures and units with two master streams can
simultaneously cover the fire building and exposure. Be thoroughly
familiar with your apparatus and their capabilities.
Remember to save a spot for second or third arriving apparatus
(Photo 5).
|

|
| Photo 5 –
Tower ladders are an effective tool in exposure protection.
Here, one ladder is used on the fire building while the other
operates on the exposure. Assign a planning chief or water
supply officer to evaluate which streams are most needed as the
incident progresses and water availability is diminished.
Photo courtesy of Tim Tonge, CRFD. |
-
Use a
thermal imager to help direct streams through the smoke to the
most needed areas and also to determine where exposures are most
threatened. By placing the camera in a tower ladder on a high
vantage point like a roof, the trained camera operator can help
assure the streams are hitting their intended target (Photo 6).
|

|
Photo 6 – This
thermal image shows a large body of fire in the cockloft and top
floor of the fire building and clearly illustrates the streams
and their effect on the fire. Even in thick smoke conditions and
darkness, the Thermal Imaging Camera is very valuable in this
type of situation. Photo by author. |
-
Assign
a water supply officer or planning chief to look at where and what
lines are in service and determine how to maximize your potential
flow as needed. At large scale operations, the IC may not be
able to see which streams are having the desired effects and which
streams should be shut down to free up water elsewhere. Assign a
competent command officer to take a walk about and see what is
working and what is not. Remember that the scene is dynamic and
just because the current arrangement of resources is working now,
it is worth reevaluating after a period of time to see what has
changed.
-
Last
but not least is the important concept of having a realistic
approach to the incident. While we are all optimistic that we can
handle the fire in front of us without burning down the block, it
is important for the IC and Division supervisors to plan for the
worst and work on contingency plans should the fire extend to
multiple exposures. Pessimistic apparatus placement (placing with
collapse and defensive operations in mind) should be considered at
any incident where large volumes of fire are noted on arrival and
the incident commander is starting from a defensive posture.
Consider the possibility of total involvement and plan accordingly
(Photo 7).
|

|
|
Photo 7 –
What will happen if the building becomes fully involved?
Consider this when spotting your apparatus and make contingency
plans as needed. Photo courtesy of Captain Damian Emerick, NFD.
|
© Copyright
Firenuggets.com 2008 Click here for Terms and
Conditions of Use
 <SIGN OUT
RETURN TO CURRENT ISSUE INDEX
|